Here's what we hear from other TA leaders…
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
"Every CV reads like the JD. ChatGPT killed our screening signal."
Every CV reads like the JD. ChatGPT killed our screening signal.
"One person interviews. A different one shows up day one. Manual checks still miss it."
One person interviews. A different one shows up day one. Manual checks still miss it.
"Niche roles need outbound. My team builds lists, runs sequences, chases replies. Half the day, gone — and our own ATS never gets mined."
Niche roles need outbound. Lists, sequences, replies — half the day, gone. Our ATS never gets mined.
How they tried solving it
Do it manually or outsource
Burn the team. Or burn the budget.
- Expensive
- Inconsistencies, bias
Assessment tools
Useful at the bottom. Useless at the top.
- Poor candidate UX
- Setup, admin, review effort
Can [new] ATS do it?
System of record. Not system of judgment.
- Doesn't help find top talent
- No sourcing, CV screening unreliable
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
Pay your way: flat-rate unlimited applicant screens or
flexible pay-as-you-go
4.7 by candidates: others filter for praise—we ask every candidate
for anonymous feedback