Here's what we hear from other TA leaders…
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
"Every resume now reads like the job description. AI killed our screening signal — we can't tell who's actually qualified from who just pasted the JD into ChatGPT."
...every resume reads like the JD now - AI killed our screening signal.
"One person interviews, a different person shows up day one. We cross-check LinkedIn against resumes by hand — and still get burned on remote hires."
...one person interviews, another shows up day one - cross-checking by hand still burns us.
"Applications tripled. Actual fit dropped. For niche roles, LinkedIn sourcing eats the team — and we still miss candidates already in our own ATS."
...applications tripled, fit dropped - and we still miss talent in our own ATS.
How they tried solving it
Do it manually or outsource
good if you have unlimited resources...
- Expensive
- Inconsistencies, bias
Assessment tools
useful lower in the funnel but...
- Poor candidate UX
- Setup, admin, review effort
Can [new] ATS do it?
system of record and pipeline...
- Doesn't help find top talent
- No sourcing, CV screening unreliable
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
Pay your way: flat-rate unlimited applicant screens or
flexible pay-as-you-go
4.7 by candidates: others filter for praise—we ask every candidate
for anonymous feedback