Here's what we hear from other TA leaders…
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
"We're drowning in applications for popular roles — team burns out screening, when great candidates slip through we get called 'reactive', lose trust."
...drowning in applications - my team's burning out and great candidates slip through.
"For niche roles, manual sourcing drains us — LinkedIn, job boards... still miss talent already in ATS. TA under pressure but we're stretched thin already."
...manual sourcing drains us - we're stretched thin and still missing talent in our own ATS.
"We need to be more efficient and adopt AI — but if it hurts candidate experience, TA gets blamed."
...need to adopt AI - but worried it'll hurt candidate experience and we'll get blamed.
How they tried solving it
Do it manually or outsource
good if you have unlimited resources...
- Expensive
- Inconsistencies, bias
Assessment tools
useful lower in the funnel but...
- Poor candidate UX
- Setup, admin, review effort
Can [new] ATS do it?
system of record and pipeline...
- Doesn't help find top talent
- No sourcing, CV screening unreliable
80% of team effort spent on gruntwork
Pay your way: flat-rate unlimited applicant screens or
flexible pay-as-you-go
4.7 by candidates: others filter for praise—we ask every candidate
for anonymous feedback